Florida Assembly Intelligence Report

Ourgovvstheirgov

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪ 9/10 — This article directly addresses the concept of jural assemblies and their role in reclaiming the rightful government of the United States, which is highly relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work.

Anna von Reitz explains that the US government has been taken over by a ‘de facto’ government, and that Americans can reclaim their rightful government by organizing unincorporated jural assemblies at the township, county, and state levels. These assemblies would be responsible for enforcing the public and organic law of the United States, electing officials, and administering local and state governments. The article emphasizes the importance of self-governance and the need for Americans to take responsibility for their own government. This matters because if Americans fail to do so, a vacuum of power will be filled by self-interested groups and entities that will exploit and defraud them.

“We are responsible for governing ourselves, via this process of self-assembly, but, when we fail to do this (or worse, become so dumbed-down that we don’t realize that we have to do this), it leaves a vacuum of power begging to be filled.”

“The lawful government of these United States has been left to rot and ruin because of ignorance promoted by the ‘public school’ system put in place by incorporated ‘states’.”

“The American organic states belong to us in sum total— air, land, and sea jurisdictions all belong to us and to our progeny.”

Defactovsdejure

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪ 8/10 — This article is directly relevant to the sovereignty process and the need for state assemblies to reclaim their lawful governance structures.

Anna von Reitz explains that the US courts have been operating under international law since 1965, abandoning American Common Law Courts and Public Offices. This was done for personal gain through ‘federal revenue sharing’ and has left the people without access to their constitutional guarantees. As a result, the people must establish their own Common Law Courts and Sheriffs to enforce the Law of the Land. This matters because it highlights the need for state assemblies to take action to reclaim their sovereignty and establish their own lawful governance structures.

“When the Colonists came here they set up Common Law Courts and Amendment VII clearly requires American Common Law Courts to decide all matters affecting people and their property….”

“All levels of government in this country unlawfully converted themselves to operate as incorporated franchises of federal ‘parent’ corporations.”

“We, the people, are still owed a Republican style of government and control of the land jurisdiction of this country,”

Commonvadmiralty

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪ 8/10 — This article directly addresses the concept of jural assemblies and Common Law, which are relevant to state assembly operations and sovereignty.

Anna von Reitz explains the difference between Common Law and Admiralty Law, emphasizing the importance of choosing Common Law and forming jural assemblies to elect judges and live accordingly. She highlights key characteristics of Common Law, including jury nullification, the role of judges, and the presumption of innocence. This matters because it provides a framework for reclaiming sovereignty and creating a more just and fair system of governance.

“Those who don’t want to accept that are outlaws. Those who do are law abiding.”

“Jury nullification is where the average people called to jury duty get to enforce their will on the entire system— in Common Law, that is.”

“The judge is just a referee and servant of the court and the clerk is just that, a clerk keeping good records of the proceedings and testimony, evidence and filings.”

Moreevidence

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪ 8/10 — This article is directly related to the concept of sovereignty and jurisdiction, as well as the potential impact of the IMF’s plan on the American people.

Anna von Reitz writes a letter to Pope Francis objecting to the IMF’s proposed ‘Global Currency Reset’ plan, which she claims is a fraudulent scheme to dump worthless digital money into bank accounts owned by ESTATE trusts created without the knowledge or consent of living Americans. She demands that the American people be repaid in gold and silver for the debts owed to them, rather than worthless digital money. This matter is crucial as it affects the sovereignty and jurisdiction of the American people.

“Likewise, there can be no trade of a ‘bowl of porridge’ –rendered as meaningless keystrokes on a digital ledger— in exchange for our land and our birthright.”

“The only valid contracts are the covenants of God, and that we are not bound by the legislation of men so long as we are bound by the Law of God”

“This was fraud and theft by evil men occupying and abusing positions of public and private trust.”

Applesororanges

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪ 8/10 — This article is directly related to the sovereignty process and the establishment of jural assemblies, which is relevant to state assembly operations and status correction steps.

Anna von Reitz argues that Americans are mistakenly using the corporate-controlled admiralty law system instead of their rightful Common Law system, which grants the people the power of jury nullification. This has led to a debt collection agency masquerading as a justice system. To correct this, Anna suggests organizing jural assemblies to establish American Common Law Courts. This matters because it affects the ability of citizens to access justice and hold those in power accountable.

“In the Common Law, which we are owed, the people have the right of ‘jury nullification’. Any jury of 12 honest Americans can overturn, edit, or abolish any law passed by any legislature. Period.”

“Milligan Ex Parte says that wherever our American Common Law Courts are functioning, there is no excuse for them using military-corporate tribunals.”

“Nobody can do it for you.”

Johndaresh4

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪ 8/10 — This article is directly related to the sovereignty process, land/soil jurisdiction, and the importance of forming Jural Assemblies and operating American Common Law Courts.

Anna von Reitz argues that John Daresh and the National Liberty Alliance (NLA) are incorrectly operating Common Law Grand Juries as US Citizens, which can lead to Martial Common Law Grand Juries operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea. She emphasizes the importance of forming Jural Assemblies and operating American Common Law Courts to avoid Admiralty Law and Federal Military Tribunals. This matters because it affects the sovereignty and jurisdiction of American State Nationals.

“I am an American State National (Article IV, Section 2). I am also an Alaskan owed the contractual provisions of The Alaska Statehood Compact, which guarantees the Equal Footing Doctrine.”

“For people unaware of these facts (see Kyle Rearden, John Daresh, and their associates above) the common and ignorant assumption is that we should all be Bar Members and should be listed as judges or justices working for the “STATE OF ALASKA” or “STATE OF COLORADO” court systems, when in fact by Amendment of the people’s Constitution, we cannot be Bar Members and have nothing to do with the admiralty court system at all.”

“It is only when we fail to do so, Federal Military Tribunals are authorized for the sake of public safety and peacekeeping to come into our states and railroad us under foreign Admiralty Law.”

Disinformation

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪ 8/10 — This article is directly related to the concept of land/soil jurisdiction and the legitimacy of the US Congress, which is relevant to the Florida Assembly’s operations and jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz argues that the US Congress cannot simply ‘take back’ its powers under the Constitution because it operates as a foreign corporation and has no mandate to represent the people and the land jurisdiction of the United States. She claims that the issue was settled over 200 years ago and that the Federal United States allows dual citizenship, but the states do not recognize ‘United States Citizens’ as legitimate representatives. This has significant implications for the legitimacy of the US Congress and the governance of the country.

“How can a foreign ‘Congress’ acting as a Board of Directors of a foreign corporation and as oligarchs operating a foreign ‘union of states’ — the Insular States and DC plus fifty Federated ‘States’ operating in the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea as a democracy without a mandate— switch its spots and pretend to represent the people and the jurisdiction of the land of these United States?”

“The Several States of the Union have and recognize only State Nationals—- Californians, Texans, Wisconsinites, and so on.”

“Never the twain shall meet.”

Judgeorjustice

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪ 8/10 — This article is directly related to the concept of sovereignty and jurisdiction, which is relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work in asserting state and national sovereignty.

Anna von Reitz explains the difference between the ‘delegated’ and ‘undelegated’ jurisdictions of the Alaska State Court, highlighting the importance of understanding the reserved powers of the states and people under Article X of the Constitution. She emphasizes her dual role as a Judge in international jurisdiction and a Justice of the Peace in national jurisdiction. This distinction is crucial for asserting sovereignty and correcting misunderstandings about the role of foreign governments and the Federal United States Government.

“The actual Constitution delegated only nineteen strictly enumerated functions to the ‘Federal Government’—all in the international jurisdiction of the sea.”

“In the international jurisdiction it is my duty (and sometimes pleasure) to stomp on trespasses and usurpations against the sovereignty of the actual states and people made by foreign governments, including the foreign Federal United States Government and its franchises.”

“In the national (state) jurisdiction it is my honor to serve as a Justice of the Peace for those who wish to live under the American Common Law as American State Nationals.”

Ericwilliams

sovereignty|jurisdiction

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪ 8/10 — This article is about land/jurisdiction and sovereignty process, specifically how to challenge court authority and understand citizenship laws.

Anna von Reitz explains how Eric Williams successfully challenged the court’s jurisdiction by questioning the definition of citizenship and the burden of proof. Williams’ approach highlights the importance of self-determination and the need for individuals to understand their own citizenship status. This matters because it shows how citizens can challenge the court’s authority and potentially avoid prosecution. The case demonstrates the power of critical thinking and knowledge of citizenship laws.

“Your challenge works because if you don’t know who you are, neither, obviously, do the prosecutor nor the judge.”

“That said, your protest seems dishonest and I’m not sure I believe you.”

“How can I renounce that which I never applied for?”

Anuhotep

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|spiritual

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work on sovereignty and jurisdiction, as it discusses the concept of ‘Anu:hotep/anaroth’ and its significance in the ancient language, and references the prophet Jeremiah and the Tribe of Benjamin.

Anna von Reitz argues that those who have trespassed against the people are being observed and will be held accountable. She uses ancient language to convey this message, referencing the prophet Jeremiah and the Tribe of Benjamin. The perpetrators have forgotten the lessons of the past and continue to commit crimes, but Anna reminds them that their actions are known and will not go unpunished. She calls for them to learn from their mistakes and stop their heinous and evil actions.

“They have also forgotten the words of Jeremiah and the meaning of them, but I have not, and I stand here as a witness against them for making the SAME mistakes over and over and not taking the lessons of the past to heart.”

“It’s not possible to lie. It’s not possible to cheat, to steal, to plot, to murder, or do any of these other vile things without it being known and without it coming straight back to you like a ball thrown against a wall.”

“The ONLY thing that can help is if they learn their lessons at last and stop doing what is heinous and evil and contemptible.”

The Hidden Truth Behind US Federal Elections

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|spiritual|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article discusses the concept of the United States Trust and the role of the ‘United States Trustees’, which is relevant to the sovereignty process and land jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz argues that the US federal election process is a fraud, and that the true power lies with the ‘United States Trustees’ who are responsible for the country’s management. She claims that these Trustees serve at the pleasure of the beneficiaries of the United States Trust, which includes anyone born on US land or with relatives who were here before 1888. This means that individuals have the power to choose new Trustees if they have acted in Breach of Trust. The article suggests that people should focus on their role as beneficiaries of the United States Trust rather than participating in the federal election process.

“State Nationals elect. Federal ‘United States’ Citizens vote.”

“You are lords and ladies of the Manor, everyone is chasing around worrying about who will be the new manager of the Lawn Maintenance Company”

“These Trustees serve at your pleasure. As the beneficiaries of the United States Trust, you can choose new Trustees because you have proof that the current Trustees have acted in Breach of Trust.”

Direction

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — The article discusses sovereignty, jurisdiction, and the importance of standing up against evil, which are all relevant to the Florida Assembly’s mission.

Anna von Reitz responds to a reader’s plea for direction on how to stop evil and suggests that if 10% of Christians in the US stood up against it, problems would evaporate overnight. She references Iceland’s success in challenging the USSC and suggests a similar approach. The article also highlights the dangers of HAARP and chemtrails.

“‘If just 10% of the 72% of Americans who are Christian were to stand up, (and Man Up), ALL OF OUR PROBLEMS would begin to evaporate over-night.'”

“‘Control the weather you control food production and with the added toxins you destroy mans bodily health.'”

“‘God directs us to MAN UP.'”

Wherelawcomesfrom

sovereignty|jurisdiction|legal|spiritual

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — The article discusses the relationship between law, religion, and jurisdiction, which is relevant to the sovereignty process and land/soil jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz argues that all law, except natural law, originates from religion, specifically from the Bible. She claims that by standing in court, people unknowingly consent to be judged according to the judge’s interpretation of the Bible. This has significant implications for individual sovereignty and jurisdiction. The article encourages readers to question and refuse to consent to the jurisdiction of ‘equity courts’.

“The short answer is that all law, except ‘Natural Law’ like the Law of Gravity, comes from religion.”

“The reason you ‘rise’ is to show your respect for the Bible and to physically signal your consent to be judged according to its rules as interpreted by the judge and/or jury.”

“I don’t consent.”

Stepbystep

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction and the process of declaring political status and emancipation, which is relevant to the sovereignty and jurisdiction aspects of state assembly operations.

Anna von Reitz explains that people’s names should have been recorded on the land jurisdiction of their state of birth, not ‘registered’ as a ‘vessel’ name in the foreign international jurisdiction. She provides a step-by-step guide to correct this and declare one’s political status and emancipation. This matters because it affects individuals’ understanding of their rights and status under the law.

“Your name should have been recorded on the land jurisdiction of the state you were born in, NOT ‘registered’ as a ‘vessel’ NAME in the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea.”

“I claim to have been born one of the progeny of the People of the United States as they styled and established themselves in the Preamble of The Constitution for the united States of America”

“I do freely and under penalty of perjury under the Common Law declare that I have never, ever, willingly, knowingly, and intentionally—having first been fully informed of the negative consequences—voluntarily subjected myself or my property to the authority of the British Crown”

Millions of Americans Mischaracterized as ‘Citizens’: A Sovereignty Crisis

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction, jural assemblies, and sovereignty process, specifically the mischaracterization of Americans as ‘citizens’ and the creation of corporate personas.

Anna von Reitz claims millions of Americans have been defrauded and mischaracterized as ‘citizens’ of the United States, when in fact they are living people with a different political status. She argues that her own birth was misrepresented, and she was created as a corporate persona to control and seize upon. This has led to the creation of foreign situs trusts and Cestui Que Vie trusts, making her estate liable for payment of charges. She is seeking to correct this mischaracterization and restore her true political status.

“The governmental services corporation doing business as the United States of America, Inc. and its franchise known as the State of Wisconsin were in Chapter 11 Reorganization at the time.”

“They also named this foreign situs trust as a surety for their own corporate bankruptcy.”

“They also further ‘bifurcated title’ to ‘me’ and created a Federal Municipal CITIZEN –a Cestui Que Vie Trust created, owned and operated by the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation: ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER”

Claimyourbabies

sovereignty|jurisdiction

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction and sovereignty process, specifically the issue of parents asserting their rights to their children and refusing to acknowledge the state’s jurisdiction over them.

Anna von Reitz advises parents to claim their babies as living beneficiaries of a trust by recording their Trade Name in local papers before birth, and to resist hospital attempts to sign over their babies to the state. This is a sovereignty issue, as parents are asserting their rights to their children and refusing to acknowledge the state’s jurisdiction over them.

“Pick out a name for your baby BEFORE they are born and record their Trade Name by publication in the local papers or by recording it with the local Land Recorder’s Office prior to them being born.”

“I am a living beneficiary of the colorado trust and I am not consenting.”

“It is a capital-level offense– a hanging crime– to mischaracterize an unarmed non-combatant, so unless you are claiming that i or my son have offered to harm anyone, you need to stand down.”

Lbbork

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — The article is about land/soil jurisdiction, jural assemblies, and sovereignty process, making it relevant to those interested in these topics.

Anna von Reitz argues that LB Bork’s understanding of the dual system of law is incomplete and that the 14th Amendment is not the key to understanding the issue. She claims that the Constitution of the United States of America is a codicil to the original Will of the Constitution for the United States of America and that the organization that floated the corporate charter is dead and gone. This has implications for understanding sovereignty and jurisdiction in the United States. The article is relevant to those interested in sovereignty and jurisdiction, particularly in the context of the Patriot Movement.

“It’s not what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so that gets you into trouble.”

“I say that at most, the ‘Constitution of the United States of America’ represents a codicil to the Will established by ‘The Constitution for the united States of America'”

“I say that if any of that ever really mattered it no longer does, because the organization that floated the corporate charter deceptively named the Constitution of the United States of America is dead and gone, bankrupted, and that bankruptcy settled in 1999.”

Judgeannainterview

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction, jural assemblies, and sovereignty process, making it relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work.

Anna von Reitz explains how the American people have been deceived into giving up their natural birthright jurisdiction on land to the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea, allowing the BAR to commit crimes against them, including identity theft, kidnapping, and plundering their assets. This has been done through the creation of corporate persons without their knowledge or consent. The Federal Reserve, World Bank, and other international banks are responsible for this conspiracy. This has resulted in the violation of the Nuremberg Trials principles, making it a commercial and war crime against defenseless civilians.

“They have been committing this crime against us, they’ve created these persons, these corporations without our knowledge or consent and that is the person being charged in every single court case that you can bring before me.”

“They are using these two crimes basically identity theft. They’re kidnapping us and our land assets into the international jurisdiction of the sea, which is a crime known as press-ganging.”

“This had been done to us by foreign governments and international banks. I want everyone to know that the principal banks responsible for this are the Federal Reserve, the World Bank, the International Bank of Reconstruction and Development, and the International Monetary Fund.”

Restoringamerica

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article discusses land/soil jurisdiction, jural assemblies, and common law, which are relevant to the sovereignty process and state assembly operations.

Anna von Reitz responds to Bill Goode’s concerns about individuals misusing the court system to restore America to the Constitution, emphasizing the importance of due process and lawful authority. She defends her own actions as a Common Law Attorney, but criticizes others for lacking due process in their legal activities. This matters because it highlights the complexities and potential pitfalls of restoring the Constitution through the court system.

“I am willing to guess that Bill Goode of Kingman, Arizona, doesn’t even know the difference between ‘legal’ and ‘lawful’ and that he and everyone else listening to him would benefit greatly from simply looking up the definition of these two words in any online Law Dictionary they choose.”

“He is also assuming that we weren’t elected by those who are lawful constituents in our home counties and/or states—-another big mistake on his part.”

“our government merely contracts for services from the United States Government—– a very different situation.”

Lettertopope

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|spiritual|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction, jural assemblies, and sovereignty process, as it discusses the struggle for American sovereignty and the role of corporations in the United States.

Anna von Reitz writes to Pope Francis in 2016, criticizing the involvement of the Chinese in a money laundering scheme and the Holy See’s lack of action against corporations that have committed fraud against the American people. She argues that the corporations must be liquidated without harming innocent people. The letter highlights the need for the Holy See to take a stance against these corporations and provide a remedy for the American people. This matters because it reveals the ongoing struggle for sovereignty and jurisdiction in the United States.

“The perpetrators have now involved the Chinese in their schemes and are proposing to lend our gold to the Chinese —who are in turn offering to lend it back to us– profiting the criminals and the Chinese in the process.”

“The abuses of the corporations have continued and reached legendary proportions and still there is no comprehensive statement from the Holy See revealing the fictitious nature of these entities that have been spawned under its auspices and no public denunciation of their criminality and no visible movement to punish, regulate, or liquidate them.”

“Do we look or sound like franchises of a bankrupt Puerto Rican electric company? If we knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily agreed to be enfranchised in this manner, would we be writing to you?”

Fraudkillingremedy

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is relevant to the sovereignty process and jurisdiction, as it provides a framework for understanding the distinction between the ‘United States’ and ‘United States of America’ and how to use this knowledge to break the shackles of the Great Fraud.

Anna von Reitz argues that the ‘United States’ and ‘United States of America’ are not the same entity, and that the ‘United States’ refers to a corporate entity created in 1871, while the ‘United States of America’ refers to the actual sovereign nation. This distinction is crucial in understanding the jurisdiction and authority of the federal government. The article provides a template for a ‘Fraud Killer’ that can be used to break the shackles of the Great Fraud.

“Finally— a Simple Fraud-Killing Remedy”

“When you get to the end, you will find a template that lays out the very simple one-page Fraud Killer.”

“This does not mean that you should abandon your efforts to document your own identity and proper standing and that of your relatives—but you now have in your hands a very powerful means to break the shackles of the Great Fraud.”

Formalnoticetocongress

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article discusses land jurisdiction, jural assemblies, and the concept of the United States Trust, which are relevant to the sovereignty process and assembly operations.

Anna von Reitz sends a formal notice to the Alaska Congressional Delegation, stating that they do not represent her and that she is a Beneficiary of the United States Trust, which they are supposed to administer. She claims that the United States has been in a state of war since 1861 and that the land jurisdiction has not been declared at peace. She demands that they resume operation of the proper civil government or be revealed as a corporate military dictatorship.

“I am writing to you today pursuant to my duty to fully inform you.”

“The blame for this continuing outrage against humanity rests firmly on the shoulders of your predecessors and now upon your shoulders.”

“Resume operation of the proper civil government owed to us under international treaty or stand revealed before the entire world as a despicable corporate military dictatorship being run by international banks under color of law.”

Birth Certificate Fraud: A Threat to Individual Sovereignty

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|spiritual|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is relevant to the Florida Assembly because it discusses the concept of sovereignty and the exploitation of individuals through the birth certificate system, which is a critical issue for jural assemblies and common law.

Anna von Reitz argues that birth certificates are used to create a false narrative of ownership, making individuals appear as assets that can be bought and sold. This is a form of slavery, where people unknowingly agree to give up their rights and possessions. The author urges people to reject this system and reclaim their sovereignty. The matter is crucial because it affects the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals.

“You AGREE to their claim that you are a slave, and that everything you possess is theirs, and subject to their disposal in ‘equitable exchange’ for some pieces of paper and digits they created out of thin air based on the value of your own actual assets.”

“You and everything that you naturally possess including your children are the object being offered for sale, the slave, the property, the asset backing all those millions of IOUs.”

“If you have a brain in your head, you won’t ‘cash out’ your Birth Certificate or tolerate this bull at all.”

Callingoutnla

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction, jural assemblies, and sovereignty process, making it relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work.

Anna von Reitz criticizes John Daresh and the National Liberty Alliance (NLA) for their lack of understanding of the American Common Law Court System and their attempts to operate in an American court without proper jurisdiction. She argues that NLA members are British subjects, not free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States, and therefore cannot exercise the powers of the people. This is a matter of sovereignty and jurisdiction, with significant implications for the legitimacy of NLA’s actions.

“You have to know which is which— apple or orange? And you have to know and be able to prove who you are with respect to the two groups— free or subject?”

“British subjects can no more operate any part of an American Common Law Court than they can flap their arms and fly.”

“Or what’s closer to the truth— a bunch of British subjects showing up to operate an American court, and then accusing Americans of ‘insurrection’ when they object to this idiocy?”

Sovereignvcitizen

sovereignty|jurisdiction

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work on sovereignty and jurisdiction, as it provides a clear explanation of the distinction between sovereignty and citizenship.

Anna von Reitz argues that the term ‘sovereign citizen’ is an oxymoron, as it combines two mutually exclusive concepts: sovereignty and citizenship. She claims that true sovereignty belongs to the people, not individuals, and that the term ‘sovereign citizen’ is often used to mislead or confuse people. This matters because it affects how people understand their relationship with the government and their rights as individuals.

“There is no such thing. It is a literal impossibility to be a ‘sovereign’ and a ‘citizen’ at the same time.”

“The term ‘sovereign’ cancels out the term ‘citizen’ and vice versa.”

“We are talking about ‘people’ being the ‘sovereigns’ of this country, not ‘persons’ being sovereign over themselves or anything else.”

Dareshroundtwo

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is relevant to sovereignty process and land/soil jurisdiction, as it discusses the distinction between de jure and de facto governments and the role of common law judges.

Anna von Reitz responds to John Daresh’s accusations that she and others are leading a ‘quasi-shadow government movement’ that aims to overthrow the government. She argues that Daresh is misinformed and that their efforts are based on existing law and the restoration of the de jure government. This matters because it highlights the importance of understanding the difference between the de jure and de facto governments and the role of common law judges in restoring sovereignty.

“What government? A corporation run by international banking cartels is not our government, is it?”

“We are properly elected Common Law Judges but Daresh mistakenly thinks that we are ‘supposed to be’ Admiralty Judges instead.”

“I have been here in the same spot since 1992 as thousands of people who have contacted me directly and honestly can confirm.”

Realamericangovernment

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — The article provides a detailed explanation of the American system’s structure and organization, highlighting the importance of jural assemblies and the perpetual Union of States.

Anna von Reitz explains the distinction between nation-states, states, and counties in the American system, emphasizing the importance of understanding the land-based jurisdiction and the role of jural assemblies. The article highlights the perpetual Union of States created by the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution’s role in establishing a debt agreement between the States and the federal government. This understanding is crucial for correcting misconceptions and clarifying the true nature of American governance. The article provides a historical context for the American system, shedding light on the structure and organization of the nation-states and their relationship with the federal government.

“The Forefathers established nation-states in each of the colonies. Nations are political entities composed of members of Jural Assemblies— unincorporated associations of people who join together for the purpose of defining and enforcing local law;”

“A ‘constitution’ is by definition a ‘debt agreement or contract’, and in this case, it memorialized a contract for services between the States and the new ‘Federal Government’ they organized as means to provide these ‘services in common’ and which acknowledged the debt that the original States incurred as a result.”

“In the American System, generally speaking, townships make up counties, counties make up states, and the political power vested in these organic states and their living people forming their jural assemblies flows upward—- from the bottom up, not the top down.”

UN Corporation and IMF: A Threat to American Sovereignty?

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction, jural assemblies, and sovereignty process, as it affects the status of Americans and their relationship with the government.

Anna von Reitz writes a letter to Pope Francis, claiming that the UN Corporation and IMF have decriminalized crimes such as racketeering and murder against corporations, and that this is a scam to redefine Americans as ‘persons’ and seize their assets. She demands that the Pope take action to liquidate the UN Corporation and IMF, and return titles to living people. This is a matter of sovereignty and jurisdiction, as it affects the status of Americans and their relationship with the government.

“The core of this problem is that the same scam artists have endeavored to secretly redefine all the people in America as ‘persons’ and to seize upon all the assets of their estates as ‘personal assets’ backing the private corporate debts of the UN Corp, IMF, UNITED STATES and so on.”

“We call upon you to take immediate action to liquidate the UN Corporation and the IMF while exempting all American ESTATE trusts and all American STATES from claims or seizures.”

“The last shall be first and the first shall be last. We are not going to be defrauded out of our rights.”

Slavery

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is relevant to the sovereignty process and land/jurisdiction concepts, as it discusses the redefinition of individuals as ‘persons’ and corporations, and the implications for individual sovereignty.

Anna von Reitz argues that the US government has redefined individuals as ‘persons’ and corporations, allowing them to claim assets and commit crimes without consequences. This is a result of a historical manipulation of the law, starting with FDR. The article calls for individuals to correct their records and assert their sovereignty.

“There is no Public Law against enslaving a corporation. Or murdering a corporation. Or racketeering against a corporation.”

“We are people, not persons. Correct your records accordingly.”

“Neither we nor any ‘person’ associated with us is a ‘citizen of the United States’ defined as ‘territories and District of Columbia’ and we never have been.”

Criticalpoint

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article discusses the concept of land/soil jurisdiction, jural assemblies, and common law, which are relevant to the sovereignty process and assembly operations.

Anna von Reitz argues that Americans are misinformed about their relationship with the Constitution, which she claims only applies to the federal government, not living people. She emphasizes that Americans are not bound by the Constitution but rather have their own natural and unalienable rights. She encourages Americans to wake up to their true status as free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States and to restore their lawful government through jural assemblies and common law courts.

“You are a Californian, a Wisconsinite, an Iowan, a Texan, by birth. The organic states are your nations.”

“We don’t live under The Constitution. They do.”

“Tell them the history and the facts and ignore them.”

Emergencyreview

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction and the concept of corporate personas, which is relevant to the sovereignty process and jural assemblies.

Anna von Reitz explains how the ‘Federal United States’ has created a corporate persona for each individual, using their given name to issue bonds and I.O.U.s, and now seeks to hold them liable for debts. This is a form of identity theft and credit fraud. Understanding this concept is crucial for individuals to protect themselves from being held accountable for the debts of the corporate persona.

“YOU is not you the living man or woman. YOU — this corporate persona created ‘for’ you by people and organizations merely claiming to ‘represent’ you, is an ESTATE trust based on the pretension that you are ‘civilly dead’ and that you agreed to this ‘status’, when in fact you were never told a word about any of this crappola.”

“Money has to have value in and of itself in order to be money. Paper has only the value of paper.”

“This circumstance makes you the Priority Creditor of YOU, but since the perpetrators never recorded your actual birth on the land, there is no public record of your existence except the condemning evidence that a Birth Certificate Bond was entered in your given name.”

Kylerearden

sovereignty|common law|jurisdiction

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is relevant to the sovereignty process and the distinction between ‘liberty’ and ‘freedom’, which are important concepts for assembly members to understand.

Anna von Reitz criticizes Kyle Rearden for spreading misinformation about her and the Common Law Judges, emphasizing that ‘sovereign citizen’ is an oxymoron and that American State Nationals are indeed sovereigns. She references her book and Supreme Court decisions to support her claims. The article highlights the importance of understanding the difference between ‘liberty’ and ‘freedom’.

“Sovereign Citizen is an oxymoron. The words are mutually exclusive, and anyone even using this phrase is too ignorant to be talking to me about these topics, much less talking about me.”

“If we aren’t ‘legitimate’ — please explain why we aren’t enjoying a stint in one of the already overflowing federal prisons?”

“If that’s what you mean by ‘liberty’, yes, it is under attack and rightly so, for it is a venal substitute for freedom, and not half of what we are owed.”

Nofakejudges

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction and the importance of common law courts, which is relevant to the sovereignty process and state assembly operations.

Anna von Reitz argues that the US has two court systems: admiralty and common law. The common law system, which operates on land jurisdiction, has been largely absent from American courts. She claims that Americans must take responsibility for establishing their own common law courts and self-governance. This is crucial for achieving true justice and preventing corruption.

“You have to provide your own government. You are supposed to be self-governing.”

“If you want justice, you must give it to yourselves.”

“Who has a vested interest in trying to keep Americans from exercising their right of self-governance?”

Daresh3

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about the importance of a complete Common Law Court system, which is relevant to the sovereignty process and land/soil jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz criticizes John Daresh and the National Liberty Alliance (NLA) for their ineffective use of Common Law Grand Juries, which she believes are just one part of a larger Common Law Court system. She argues that NLA’s efforts have not led to any meaningful results, and instead, they are undermining the efforts of others to build real public courts. Von Reitz emphasizes the importance of a complete Common Law Court system, including a judge, court clerk, bailiff, grand jury, trial jury, and sheriff. This matters because it highlights the need for a comprehensive approach to establishing Common Law Courts.

“You can’t run a car on just an engine. You need a drive train. You need a fuel pump. You need brakes.”

“Well, if we are ‘fake’ then it stands to reason that they are ‘fake’ — but the truth is that if we are owed a Common Law Grand Jury, we are owed an entire Common Law Court System”

“You have the office of the judge (or justice or magistrate), you have the court clerk, you have the bailiff, you have the grand jury, you have the trial jury, and you have a sheriff and his deputies to enforce the jury’s decision.”

Commonlawcourts

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — The article provides a clear explanation of land and sea jurisdiction, which is relevant to the Florida Assembly’s understanding of sovereignty and jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz clarifies the difference between ‘Common Law Courts’ and ‘Courts of Common Law’, explaining that the former refers to land jurisdiction and the latter to sea jurisdiction. This distinction is crucial for individuals asserting their birthright status as Americans. The article highlights the importance of understanding jurisdiction when operating courts or asserting political status.

“Common Law Courts are courts operating on the land jurisdiction.”

“Courts of Common Law = Sea Jurisdiction = State(s) of Ohio”

“It depends, therefore, on the audience.”

Shinolatalks

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is relevant to the Florida Assembly’s sovereignty process and common law practices, as it discusses the distinction between ‘State Citizens’ and ‘citizens of the United States’ and its implications for land/soil jurisdiction and jural assemblies.

Anna von Reitz argues that Ammon Bundy and other patriots are being misled by their own ignorance of their status as ‘State Citizens’ under Article IV, Section 2 of the Federal Constitution, rather than ‘citizens of the United States’ under Amendment XIV of the Corporate Constitution. This misunderstanding leads to their prosecution and imprisonment. Anna urges people to wake up and understand their true status to avoid similar consequences.

“As Mark Twain observed— it isn’t what we know that gets us in trouble. It’s what we THINK we know that just ain’t so.”

“They are being mischaracterized and prosecuted as “citizens of the United States” under Amendment XIV of the Corporate Constitution instead.”

“Which is the same problem that causes them to mistake who I am, too.”

Areyoupuertorican

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction and the distinction between State Citizen and US citizen, which is relevant to the sovereignty process and jural assemblies.

Anna von Reitz argues that American citizens are actually State Citizens, not US citizens, and that the term ‘US citizen’ refers to individuals living in territories and the District of Columbia. She claims that claiming to be a US citizen means being subject to the federal government’s plenary power, which can be avoided by recognizing one’s State Citizen status. This matters because it affects one’s relationship with the federal government and potential loss of sovereignty.

“You are a living, breathing American and that means you are a Minnesotan, a Vermonter, a Texan—- not a “US citizen”.”

“So—- are you a Puerto Rican? Do you mean to function as a corporate franchisee of the United States, Inc. under Puerto Rican law? No? You don’t want to be “subject” to the “plenary power” of nutcases like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid? “

Dearmrrothschild

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|spiritual|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction, jural assemblies, and sovereignty process, but it is not directly about Florida or state assembly operations.

Anna von Reitz claims that the UNITED STATES and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA have been mismanaged and are insolvent, and that the author, James Clinton Belcher, has paid off the debt and is terminating the contract. This matters because it could impact the legitimacy of the US government and its relationships with other countries.

“We have already given Due Notice that we do not anticipate any renewal of contract with the UNITED STATES nor with THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, both of which have been criminally mismanaged in the past.”

“Whatever governmental services THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA offers are merely commercial services for hire under the stipulations of the original Federal Constitution, without any implied obligation on our part to continue any relationship long term.”

“We have been obliged to pay for ‘services’ we didn’t order, and have not received services that we did stipulate, which is a problem that needs to be resolved by arbitration.”

Revocation

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land jurisdiction and the voluntary nature of the ‘pledge’ to pay federal income tax, which is relevant to state assembly operations and sovereignty process.

Anna von Reitz explains that Americans can revoke their election to pay federal income tax, citing the voluntary nature of the ‘pledge’ and the sunset clause of the Victory Tax program established during World War II. This revocation takes effect at the beginning of the current federal tax year. The article emphasizes maintaining one’s status as an American State National and not a US citizen. This matters because it allows individuals to potentially avoid paying federal income tax and understand their relationship with the US government.

“Whether you knew it or not, this ‘pledge’ of your service as a Withholding Agent was always voluntary so long as you are not a federal employee (military or civilian), willingly operating as a federal corporation, of African American descent, a political asylum seeker, or welfare seeker.”

“The sunset clause of this Act makes it clear that any such election to pay federal taxes was supposed to automatically end with the cessation of armed conflict—- at the latest, August of 1945.”

“You have created a file in their system and an account number. They will continue to ‘fish’ for money from you.”

Littlewords

sovereignty|jurisdiction|common-law

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is relevant to the sovereignty process and land jurisdiction, but does not directly address state assembly operations or Florida specifically.

Anna von Reitz explains the difference between ‘Common Law Courts’ and ‘Courts of Common Law’, highlighting the significance of the word ‘of’ in indicating a secondary entity derived from or acting in behalf of something else. She argues that the use of ‘of’ in the US Constitution implies that the ‘States of America’ are not the same as the ‘Union’ created by the Articles of Confederation. This distinction has implications for jurisdiction and sovereignty.

“whenever you see the word ‘of’ it indicates a secondary entity derived from or acting in behalf of something else”

“The ‘States of America’ belong as members in the ‘perpetual union’ created by The Articles of Confederation (1781), but they do not belong to the Union thus created”

“We have to pay closer attention to all those ‘little words’—-!”

Asserting Natural and Unalienable Rights: A Call to Action

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — The article discusses sovereignty, jurisdiction, and the importance of asserting Natural and Unalienable Rights, which are relevant to the work of state assemblies and jural assemblies.

Anna von Reitz explains that immigrants to the US are often mistakenly granted ‘US citizenship’ instead of State Citizen status, limiting their rights. This is a result of the disruption of lawful state governments and the actions of the US government. She emphasizes the importance of asserting and maintaining Natural and Unalienable Rights. The article calls on individuals to support the efforts of birthright American State Nationals to assert their rights.

“They have not been granted State Citizen status, because the lawful state governments were disrupted and never acted officially to grant it.”

“You were given all your Natural and Unalienable Rights by your Creator the moment you were conceived and nobody and nothing has any right to ignore that fact, nor any claim upon you nor your assets—which includes your Natural and Unalienable Rights.”

“Thus I call on every ‘Naturalized Citizen’ to stand with us and assert their Natural and Unalienable Rights, and to support the efforts of the birthright American State Nationals to maintain their rights.”

Sheriffmack

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction and the role of sheriffs in enforcing the Constitution and Public Law, which is relevant to the sovereignty process.

Anna von Reitz argues that Sheriff Mack’s stance on enforcing the Constitution is flawed because it implies that sheriffs can pick and choose when to enforce the law, rather than being bound by it. This is a problem because it allows corporate employees to abuse their power and ignore constitutional rights. Von Reitz believes that sheriffs should be committed to enforcing the Constitution and Public Law, rather than acting as code enforcers. This matters because it affects the relationship between citizens and law enforcement.

“no man can serve two masters, and Sheriff Mack’s fence-sitting just clouds the issues.”

“The Law of the Land is the Public Law of this country. When corporate employees step foot on our soil, they are obligated to obey it.”

“Men like Sheriff Mack need to bite the bullet and give up the false powers of legal presumption.”

Protecting Individual Rights: Simple Notices and Procedures to Challenge Admiralty Court Jurisdiction

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|spiritual|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article discusses land jurisdiction, Common Law, and sovereignty process, making it relevant to state assembly operations and individual rights.

Anna Von Reitz shares results from a conference in Alaska where experts discussed Common Law and Admiralty Law. She provides simple notices and procedures to help individuals defend themselves against Admiralty Court processes, including withdrawing appearances and claiming non-combatant status. These steps can be used to challenge the jurisdiction of courts and protect individual rights.

“The results are still filtering out— with some being immediate and apparent, and others being spurred along to the next step.”

“These simple Notices and provisions are deadly, like rat poison for a rat, and they have been 100% effective in all cases where they have been used.”

“If, however, the Judge denies your Motion in Limine he is caught during the defense measures and has to allow your evidence regarding the nature and identity of the DEFENDANT—- which neither he nor the prosecutor want revealed, because it will prove that they have been engaging in attempted personage and barratry and have been knowingly misaddressing their charges to you—a man who is exempt from their charges and alien to their jurisdiction.”

May10Bankforinternationalsettlements

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article discusses sovereignty, jurisdiction, and the legitimacy of international banking cartels, which are relevant to the work of the Florida Assembly in correcting jurisdictional errors and asserting sovereignty.

Anna von Reitz claims that the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has been instructed to transfer credit to settle the ‘National Debt’ of the ‘United States’ and to prevent the murder of priority creditors. She asserts that the IMF and the Federal Reserve are at fault for the circumstance and that the American people are not responsible. The letter is addressed to the BIS Board of Governors and is signed by Anna Maria Riezinger.

“They and their respective storefront ‘governmental services corporations’ doing business as the UNITED STATES, INC. and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. are at fault for this outrageous circumstance reminiscent of the Nazis, not the American People.”

“All debts of the UNITED STATES, INC. are to be settled and discharged and no further charges accepted.”

“You are in receipt of our Sovereign Letters Patent registered with the United Nations Secretary General.”

Noticeofwithdrawal

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction and the process of reclaiming sovereignty, which is relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work on correcting status and establishing jural assemblies.

Anna von Reitz provides an example of a Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance as Agent, which is a document used to withdraw consent for a court to act on one’s behalf. This document is crucial for individuals to reclaim their sovereignty and stop the use of their name as a business entity. The document is a step towards correcting the status of an individual and preventing further manipulation by the court system. This matters because it empowers individuals to take control of their lives and challenge the authority of the court.

“i, a living man, hereby withdraw any and all appearances of myself or anyone else acting as my attorney or guardian in the representative capacity as agent for the business organization known as “JOHN QUINCY DOE/JOHN Q. DOE/John Quincy Doe/ John Q. Doe/ John Q. Doe, Jr.” or any similar name that could be confused with mine subject to my receipt of your written, verifiable claim and proof of claim to the contrary—all within three days.”

“i hereby certify that i mailed a true and correct copy of the foregoing by first class US mail postage prepaid to:”

“this 23rd day of May, A.D. 2016.”

Noticeofnonrepresentativecapacity

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land jurisdiction and jural assemblies, which is relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work on sovereignty and common law.

Anna von Reitz’s article presents a template for a ‘Notice of Non-Representative Capacity’ to be used by individuals to assert their non-representative status in court proceedings. This is part of a larger effort to reclaim sovereignty and challenge the legitimacy of government institutions. The notice serves as a way to intervene in court cases and demand proof of claim from opposing parties.

“i, a living man, hereby appears by special limited appearance in a non-representative capacity as a third party intervenor—subject to my receipt of your written verifiable claim and proof of claim to the contrary—all within three days.”

“Notice of Service of Process i hereby certify that i mailed a true and correct copy of the foregoing by first class US mail postage prepaid to:”

“re: Case# _____________”

Replyfortony

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction and the role of assemblies in correcting errors in the commercial mercenary system.

Anna von Reitz responds to a critic, Tony, who accuses her of letting the world banking cartel ‘off the hook’ by authorizing the transfer of credit to cover the UNITED STATES, INC.’s debts. She argues that this action actually forces the IMF and other creditors to correct an ‘accounting error’ that would have led to mass evictions, police actions, and destruction of the American people. This matter is relevant to state assembly operations as it touches on the concept of jurisdiction and the role of assemblies in correcting errors in the commercial mercenary system.

“What Tony and many others don’t quite grasp is that in a debt-credit system a credit is created at the same time as any debt, so if there is a ‘National Debt’ there is also already an answering ‘National Credit’.”

“I forced them to correct an ‘accounting error’ that would have provided them an excuse for using all the commercial mercenary organizations that they have in place on our soil operating under color of law.”

“If Tony would rather see mass starvation, murder, crematoriums, internment camps, and the destruction of the American people — who are in fact the Priority Creditors of the UNITED STATES, INC.”

Howtousetheglossa

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction and the process of asserting one’s true nationality and sovereignty, which is relevant to the work of state assemblies.

Anna von Reitz explains that the ‘United States’ is a federation of nation-states, and individuals are born with nationality and sovereignty tied to their state of birth. She argues that the federal government’s ‘citizenship’ is a corporate status created by the 14th Amendment, and individuals must take action to assert their true nationality and sovereignty. This involves giving judicial notice and demanding proof of federal citizenship, as well as using the Glossa Judicial Notice and Order to expose the use of knowing misrepresentation in court proceedings.

“The Naturalization Act of 1802, Seventh Congress, Session 1, Chapter 28, Sections 1-4, April 14, 1802 sets forth the exact requirements necessary for anyone born in an American state to become a United States Citizen. Period.”

“You must know this and give Judicial Notice along with an Affidavit affirming that your nativity occurred on the land of whichever state and you must demand to see any proof otherwise demonstrating that you completed the steps required by the Naturalization Act of 1802.”

“It is unlawful and illegal for any organization promoting itself as a ‘court’ to use Glossa or any other form of knowing misrepresentation.”

Pope Francis Called to Action: Restoring American Sovereignty

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction, jural assemblies, and sovereignty process, making it relevant to state assembly operations and status correction steps.

Anna von Reitz writes to Pope Francis, accusing the Roman Pontiff of being responsible for the actions of lawyers and attorneys worldwide, who have been misrepresenting Americans as corporate ‘persons’ and running private corporate tribunals as public courts. She demands that Pope Francis correct the operations of various entities, including the American Bar Association and the Federal Reserve, and facilitate the settlement of the United States National Debt. The letter is a call to action for the Pope to take responsibility for the ongoing abuses and restore the original equity contract of the American people. This matter is crucial as it affects the sovereignty and jurisdiction of the American people.

“The lawyers have been bill collectors for the Roman Pontiff since the second century BC.”

“As has already been established by the Vatican Chancery Court, people born on the land of the American organic states are the lawful beneficiaries of the land and no one may claim otherwise.”

“We call upon you to exert your full empowerment as the ultimate comptroller of the statutory law creating all corporations on Earth and your office as the Roman Pontiff to correct the operations of the American Bar Association, the International Bar Association, the International Monetary Fund, the Federal Reserve, the UNITED STATES, (INC.), and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (INC.), the UN Corporation, and all their franchises and affiliates.”

Understanding Identity and Jurisdiction: A Key to Sovereignty

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|spiritual|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article discusses the importance of understanding one’s identity and jurisdiction, which is relevant to the sovereignty process and land/soil jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz argues that the federal government has mischaracterized Americans as ‘United States Citizens’ to exert control over them, particularly in regards to controlled substances. She claims that Americans have the right to produce and possess substances like hemp, but only if they don’t sell or transport them across state lines. This misunderstanding has led to wrongful arrests and convictions. The article highlights the importance of understanding one’s identity as an American State National to avoid being subject to federal regulations.

“Much of the confusion about this is that Americans have been routinely misidentified and mischaracterized as United States Citizens and held accountable to the foreign statutory law of the Federal Corporation and their ‘federated’ States of States franchises and ‘County of……’ franchises.”

“We’re not naturally ‘United States Citizens’ of any kind and the federal corporation is grossly trespassing upon our private property when it claims otherwise, but it remains our role to object to such presumptions and to uphold our separate nation and identity.”

“Congress has no ability (and no authority) it create any new for-profit regulatory role for itself so far as we are concerned.”

Neurepublique2

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction, jural assemblies, and sovereignty process, but it’s not directly about state assembly operations or Florida specifically.

Anna von Reitz argues that the ‘New Republic’ is a French government-sponsored scam to avoid accountability for the IMF’s mismanagement. She claims that the French government chartered the IMF, which led to the creation of the UNITED STATES (INC.) corporation, and now they’re offering a new ‘government’ to suppress American demands for accountability. The American people have rejected this offer and made their own arrangements.

“The so-called ‘New Republic’ is a fraud sponsored by the French Government in an effort to paper over its liability for failure to control and maintain oversight of the IMF corporation which it chartered.”

“We have said, ‘Thanks, but no thanks. We have made other arrangements, but you are welcome to go home now and contemplate your sins and omissions.'”

“We have already provided our Sovereign Letters Patent and our Joint Declaration of Sovereignty making the Indigenous Nations our ‘federal’ partners upholding our actual Constitution and the official Successor to Contract.”

Idiotspeak

sovereignty|jurisdiction

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land jurisdiction and the process of secession, which is relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work on sovereignty and jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz argues that discussing secession without proper organization and process is counterproductive and may lead to a civil war, which benefits those who want to destroy America. She emphasizes that the only lawful way for states to secede is through a Continental Congress. This matters because it highlights the importance of understanding the process of secession and the potential consequences of hasty actions.

“We don’t want or need a civil war— which is what those vermin are hoping for, promoting, and wanting us to do.”

“We are their Priority Creditors. And they have heavily insured us.”

“The only lawful way for any state to secede is for all the states to get organized, send deputies to a Continental Congress, and rewrite the agreement.”

Whatkindofjudge

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about the sovereignty process, land jurisdiction, and the formation of a Common Law Court, which are all relevant to state assembly operations and status correction steps.

Anna von Reitz explains how the US government’s incorporation in the 1950s and 60s led to the creation of administrative and admiralty courts, taking the land jurisdiction out of the hands of sheriffs and leaving offices vacant. This change destroyed the checks and balances in the government, allowing corporations to gain power over the people. She describes how she and others formed a Common Law Court to reclaim the land jurisdiction and elect judges to uphold the Public and Organic Law.

“What we have operating in the courthouses around this country are all administrative and/or admiralty courts.”

“The Checks and Balances required to make our government work properly were destroyed by these actions taken to incorporate the states and county governments as mere franchises of the UNITED STATES, Inc.”

“That is the kind of judge I am, the jurisdiction I operate under, and the kind of judge I am helping to elect.”

Exposing the Truth: Governments as Privately Owned Corporations

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — The article discusses the nature of governments and the role of international banking cartels, which is relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work on sovereignty and jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz reveals that governments worldwide are privately owned corporations run by international banking cartels, perpetuating fraud and criminality. This has been exposed, and the truth is that the American people have been deceived and abused. The article aims to set the record straight and promote public interest litigation. This matters because it affects the legitimacy and authority of governments, including the Federal United States.

“The truth has come out finally and conclusively, by Judge Anna Von Reitz”

“The problem isn’t just the judicial system running hopelessly amok. It’s the fact that all so-called ‘governments’ are actually nothing but privately owned and operated ‘governmental services corporations’”

“Those responsible include the Crown Corporation and its agencies and subsidiaries, the government of the Inner City of London aka WESTMINSTER, the Lord Mayor, the Lords of the Admiralty, the British Monarch dba ELIZABETH II”

Nlagrandjuries

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about the concept of common law grand juries and the distinction between American State Nationals and United States Citizens, which is relevant to the sovereignty process and land/soil jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz argues that the concept of a ‘Citizens Common Law Grand Jury’ is misunderstood due to confusion between ‘American State Nationals’ and ‘United States Citizens’. She claims that only American State Nationals can serve on such a jury, and that the federal government created a new political status in 1868 through a corporate charter, which led to the creation of ‘citizens of the United States’. This distinction is crucial for understanding the legitimacy of grand juries and the role of the federal government.

“There is a great confusion in this country centering around this one simple issue.”

“A Citizen’s Common Law Grand Jury within the meaning of the Constitution as referenced by Justice Scalia and the NLA has to be acting under American Common Law and the jurors must be American State Nationals.”

Uscitizenship

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is relevant to the sovereignty process and the importance of accurate identification as American State Nationals.

Anna von Reitz explains that many people mistakenly identify as ‘US citizens’ when they are actually American State Nationals. This misidentification leads to a foreign and disadvantageous political status. She cites historical examples and laws to support her claim, urging people to stop arguing with the facts and correct their status.

“Only one way to become US citizen, make voluntary application, have oath accepted by competent authority and have this put in public records.”

“We derive our nationality from our states. We are Georgians and Vermonters and Oregonians for a reason.”

“Please stop trying to argue with the facts, just because you have mistakenly thought of yourselves as ‘US citizens’.”

Britishfriends

sovereignty|jurisdiction|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — The article provides relevant background information on the concept of land jurisdiction and the impact of corporate governance on the people’s rights and freedoms, which is applicable to the Florida Assembly’s sovereignty efforts.

Anna von Reitz argues that the British people have been enslaved by their own government through the Enfranchisement Act and Municipal Corporations Act, stripping them of their natural birthright and land jurisdiction. This parallels the situation in the United States, where the people have been similarly deceived. The article calls for the British people to wake up and understand the betrayal process, which is crucial for reclaiming their rights and freedoms.

“Englishmen are born on the land and are owed the land jurisdiction and the English Common Law but they are immediately stripped bare of their natural birthright and press ganged into the international jurisdiction of the sea, declared to be a ‘British Citizen’.”

“The result has been that the English people have been denied the rights guaranteed by the Magna Carta for 150 years and kept alive merely on propaganda and a small share of receipts from worldwide piracy.”

“Perhaps it is not so strange that the Queen of England was chosen to be the ‘Weak Link’ and Betrayer of the Magna Carta which bound her office, which is now reduced to being a rubber stamp for the Lord Mayor and the international banking cartels.”

Anarchy

sovereignty|jurisdiction

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article discusses the concept of sovereignty and jurisdiction, which is relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work on correcting the status of the state and its people.

Anna von Reitz argues that ‘going with the flow’ is not a solution to corruption and that people must take responsibility for themselves and their government. She claims that the US government is a corporation and that people’s identities and assets have been stolen and transferred to new owners. This has significant implications for individual sovereignty and jurisdiction.

“Going with the flow and not being responsible for ourselves and for what passes for our government is what has allowed these corporations including banks to become so corrupt and to get so far off track and to be so coercive in the first place.”

“We would find that we are being mischaracterized as corporations operating as franchises of the UNITED STATES, INC. or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. or some other such named privately owned and operated governmental services corporation.”

“They think they have the right to seize every penny you’ve got, and at least on paper, they do.”

Redalert

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about land/soil jurisdiction and the process of establishing an equal footing claim, which is relevant to the sovereignty process.

Anna von Reitz is calling for native-born men from every state to come forward and claim their heritage as American State Nationals, which could help establish an equal footing claim against the bankrupt house cleaning company. This involves proving ancestry and birth on state soil prior to 1888. The goal is to prevent the rats from claiming ownership of their estates. The process requires a simple Act of Expatriation and proper witnessing.

“This is nothing but an attempt by the bankrupt house cleaning company to place a false claim of ownership against our estates.”

“I need at least two native-born men from every state in the Union to stand up and lay claim to their heritage in behalf of their state and the people in it.”

“You must, according to the terms of the agreements and treaties in the time frame they were made, be able to prove that you are: (1) a male Caucasian above the age of 21 years; (2) that you were born on the soil of the state you are claiming; (3) that one or more of your Grandfathers was born either in the state you are claiming or in another state of the union prior to 1888.”

Citizenornational

sovereignty|jurisdiction

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪ 7/10 — This article is about the sovereignty process and land jurisdiction, which are relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work.

Anna von Reitz explains the difference between ‘citizens’ and ‘nationals’ in the United States, stating that ‘citizenship’ is a voluntary agreement to be subject to a government, whereas ‘nationality’ is derived from birthplace. This distinction has significant implications for personal sovereignty and jurisdiction. Understanding this difference can help individuals reclaim their sovereignty and avoid being subject to the federal government’s laws.

“You don’t have to be a ‘citizen’— that is, a subject, of anything.”

“When you claim to be a ‘citizen’ you are obligating yourself to obey all the laws and statutes of the corporation operating as the ‘United States’ or the ‘United States of America’ of the ‘State of Virginia’ or whatever.”

“When you ‘submit yourself’ to being a ‘citizen’ of a state, you lose your sovereignty and instead of the government serving you, you serve the government.”

Whatsinaname

sovereignty|jurisdiction|history|legal|spiritual

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪ 6/10 — This article provides background information on the concept of names and jurisdiction, which is relevant to understanding sovereignty and common law principles.

Anna von Reitz argues that names given to people are actually ‘the Mark of the Beast’ because they imply that the person is an animal or a thing, rather than a spiritual being. This concept is rooted in biblical law and the idea that people should be described, not named. The use of names has been a source of confusion and has led to the undermining of biblical law. This matters because it highlights the importance of understanding the nature of identity and jurisdiction.

“God doesn’t have a name. People have made up various excuses for this fact, but the scripture also quite clearly tells us the same.”

“We have no names. As children of God we are spirits inhabiting flesh, and like our Father, we have no names, only descriptions.”

“They are the Mark of the Beast. Why are they the Mark of the Beast? Because only Beasts (animals) have names.”

Aboutmoney

history|legal|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪ 6/10 — The article discusses general American governance history and legal concepts relevant as background, but does not provide actionable steps for the Florida Assembly.

Anna von Reitz explains that traditional commodity-based money systems are flawed because they create artificial scarcity, leading to skewed value perceptions. She argues that fiat money systems, where signatures serve as bonds, are inevitable and have been in use since the 1970s. This system relies on promises to pay, which can be used as collateral for other debts, creating a complex web of obligations. Millions of Americans are waking up to the fact that banks have been conning people into thinking they received loans when in fact the borrowers gave the banks the loan, using their signatures as collateral.

“Money, by definition, has to have value in and of itself. It is a substitute for other things of value.”

“In the current fiat systems, your signature is your bond. Literally. Every time you sign anything— and I do mean ANYTHING— you promise to pay it.”

“That’s how this crazy system works”

Debunking

sovereignty|jurisdiction|legal|history

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪ 6/10 — The article discusses general American governance history and legal concepts relevant as background, but does not provide actionable steps for state assembly operations or status correction.

Anna von Reitz warns against being fooled by new ‘solutions’ to the current financial and governance crisis, such as the ‘New Republic’ and ‘Global Reset’, which she claims are just variations of the same old scams. She argues that these proposals do not address the root issues and will only benefit the same corrupt parties. She emphasizes the importance of understanding the true nature of the problem and taking action to reclaim our rights and assets.

“Grow up and wise up, people.”

“It’s true that practically everyone else on the planet owes us a lot of money instead of us owing them.”

“Color all of us —and not just the Americans— everyone, worldwide—VERY STUPID if we allow this System to continue in any way, shape, manner or form.”

Lawofcontractvoid

sovereignty|jurisdiction|legal|history

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪ 6/10 — The article discusses the concept of covenants and contracts in the context of law and governance, which is relevant to the broader discussion of sovereignty and jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz argues that the Law of Contract is void because it comes from man-made agreements, whereas the Law of Covenant is valid because it is based on divine promises. This distinction has significant implications for the validity of contracts and agreements. The article suggests that none of the contracts people have signed are valid, which could have far-reaching consequences for governance and law.

“Covenants are contracts made by God. There are eight such covenants in the Bible, two that are conditional ‘If you….then I……’ covenants, and six unconditional, unilateral promises that ‘I will’ do this or that, without regard for any action taken by men.”

“If we are honest we must lament with the Prophet Jeremiah that we can’t even control a single step.”

“Nothing we propose ever quite seems to go exactly the way we intend, and rough circumstances often intervene.”

Definitions

sovereignty|jurisdiction|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪ 6/10 — This article provides background information on international governance and the potential for manipulation of groups, but it does not directly address state assembly operations or status correction steps.

Anna von Reitz explains that the IMF is the US Treasury, and that the UN Corporation controls it. She also discusses ‘controlled opposition’ groups like NLA and Oath Keepers, which she believes are manipulated by handlers to prevent actual progress. This matters because it affects our understanding of governance and the potential for meaningful change.

“The IMF functions as an agency of the United Nations, chartered in France at the end of World War II.”

“One starts an organization supposedly dedicated to a cause near and dear to one’s opponents, hangs out a shingle, and draws people who hold those sympathies into the net.”

“Time to ask which came first— the chicken or the egg? Did the World Bank pay to create these organizations in the first place, and now their Doxy is getting around to showing who is really boss?”

Whattoexpect

sovereignty|jurisdiction|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪ 6/10 — This article touches on general American governance history and legal concepts relevant as background, but does not provide actionable steps for Florida Assembly members.

Anna von Reitz warns that on April 19, 2016, the IMF and UN Corp may try to shift US debts to the American people, and the Federal Reserve may attempt to force the US back onto the Gold Standard. She suggests that Americans can repudiate the debt by using the American Silver Dollar, which is alive and ready to trade. This is relevant because it touches on the concept of sovereignty and the relationship between the US government and its people.

“The rats have not been able to corner the silver market, so that provides us with a Third Way—and the only way for us to both repudiate the odious debt and beat the Federal Reserve at its own game.”

“The American People have not been given full disclosure and have not accepted this contract and in fact— we have told Jacob Rothschild and the French Government, thanks, but no thanks, we have made other arrangements, notice of which is on file with the United Nations Secretary General.”

“We are not the same as the “United States” entity that has been ruining the whole Earth. We have in fact been victims of it ourselves.”

Neilkeenan

history|legal|sovereignty

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪ 6/10 — The article discusses general American governance history and legal concepts relevant as background, but does not provide actionable steps for the Florida Assembly.

Anna von Reitz describes how the New York Fed withheld gold deposits from the Nationalist Chinese government in 1928 and how Neil Keenan fought to return the gold to its rightful owners. The Chinese government, representing the people, is now working to return the world’s wealth to its actual heirs. This is a matter of lawful debt and fiduciary responsibility.

“The Fed banks stole us and our parents and grandparents and virtually everyone else on the planet blind for over a hundred years—–not just the Chinese.”

“The one real beef I have so far is that a clean breast of it is not being made. People are once again being told fairy tales and given excuses, which leaves everyone building on lies and sand.”

“The banks are like Pawn Shop owners caught with stolen loot they need to offload.”

Williammount

history|legal|sovereignty

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪ 6/10 — This article discusses general American governance history and legal concepts relevant as background, but does not provide actionable steps for a Florida Assembly member.

Anna von Reitz critiques Dr. William Mount’s predictions and the French government’s role in creating the UNITED STATES Inc. and the IMF, which she claims is a British-led scheme to defraud Americans. She argues that the French government is trying to use the ‘New Republic’ as a means to force Americans to pay off debts. This matters because it highlights the complexities of international governance and the potential for deceit.

“The French supplied the corporate charters to hide the British aim, and the British provided the mechanisms and the manpower to carry out the fraud scheme against the Americans.”

“The problem for the French is that because they chartered these infamous corporations, they are responsible for their lawful operation and functioning.”

“The advantage of the ‘New Republic’ from their standpoint is that if we are stupid enough to go for it, they can then use it as a means to force us to pay off the odious debts owed by the first French corporation known as the UNITED STATES, Inc.”

Network

sovereignty|jurisdiction|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪ 6/10 — The article discusses the global corporate control network and its historical context, which is relevant to understanding the sovereignty and jurisdiction of states like Florida.

Anna von Reitz argues that the global corporate control network is a natural result of the interlocking trust directorate created by the Unam Sanctum Trust over seven centuries. She criticizes Karen Hudes for trying to find excuses for the World Bank and IBRD’s actions, instead of acknowledging the truth. The article highlights the existence of a globe-spanning interlocking network of corporate control, which has evolved over time.

“What else would you expect? What other result could there be?”

“It wasn’t until about five years ago that Dutch mathematicians studying statistical correlations stumbled on evidence that only about a hundred major corporations ‘rule’ the planet and that they are all interlocked at the top.”

“What a shock of disbelief must have rippled over the thick, thick carpets and down the halls and wafted over the chrome and the walnut panel doors…… the Americans are waking up?”

May10Debttransmittalletter

sovereignty|jurisdiction|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪ 6/10 — This article is about the history and jurisdiction of the United States, which is relevant to the Florida Assembly’s understanding of its own authority and relationships with the federal government.

Anna von Reitz, representing the United States of America (Major), is informing the United Nations Secretary General and the US Secretary of State about the true nature of the ‘United States’ (Minor) and its fraudulent activities. She claims that the Major has issued new Sovereign Letters Patent and appointed new Federal representatives, and is working to settle the debts of the UNITED STATES, INC. and restore honesty to international markets. This matters because it could potentially impact the financial system and the relationships between nations.

“The “United States” that has been causing all the trouble is only “the territories and District of Columbia”.”

“The United States Major issued new Sovereign Letters Patent in November 2015 and appointed new Federal representatives.”

“We welcome the understanding and the assistance of the international community as we put our house in order.”

Birthdaypartydisaster

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪ 6/10 — The article touches on the theme of systemic corruption and the breakdown of the rule of law, which is relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work on sovereignty and jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz uses a thought-provoking analogy to describe the situation where the people’s elected representatives and law enforcement are complicit in breaking the law, making it difficult for individuals to take action or seek justice. This scenario is likened to a public orgy where everyone knows what’s happening but no one does anything about it. The article highlights the powerlessness of individuals in the face of systemic corruption and the breakdown of the rule of law. This situation is compared to the relationship between the Federal Reserve, IMF, and members of Congress, who have failed to enforce the law and have engaged in their own illicit activities.

“You are a witness to it, but what can you do about it? You are just one man and you have no public office or authority—and those you elected and entrusted to enforce the law are the ones breaking it.”

“Even after you come out of your daze and admit to yourself that you saw what you saw and heard what you heard, who is going to believe you?”

“You go back to the restaurant dining room, and everything is normal. The salad course is served, and the conversation is polite and pleasant. But you know what you know, and you can’t unsee it.”

Indigenous

sovereignty|jurisdiction|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪ 6/10 — The article discusses historical land ownership and jurisdiction, which is relevant to understanding the context of modern-day sovereignty and land claims.

Anna von Reitz argues that the concept of ‘indigenous’ people is not relevant to modern-day claims on land, as treaties and agreements were written with ‘white males above 21’ in mind. She claims that only those who were party to these contracts can exercise them, and that everyone else should let those who are part of the contract have at it. This has nothing to do with racial prejudices, but rather a circumstance left over from the past. The article challenges the idea of ‘indigenous’ nations and the Doctrine of Discovery.

“The only ones party to the statehood compacts back in the day were white males above 21 and as a result, they are the only ones who can raise their hands and claim to be successors to statehood agreements and contracts today.”

“Every single Indian and Black American tested turns out to be from somewhere else in the world—– mainly Egypt and Asia and Africa—- but somewhere else. Not here. Not ‘indigenous’.”

“We are all here together and nobody has any more sacred claim on anything than anyone else, so everyone can stop the mad dash to claim the whole world for themselves and just their racial-ethnic-religious group.”

Exposing the Web of Corruption: A Wake-Up Call for America

sovereignty|jurisdiction|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — The article touches on the broader issue of corruption and embezzlement in government, which is relevant as background information for assembly work, but does not provide actionable steps or specific information about Florida or state assembly operations.

Anna von Reitz accuses the UN Corporation, Federal Reserve, and District of Columbia Municipal Corporation of embezzling funds intended for public assistance and foreign aid, portraying a negative image of America to the world. This has led to widespread theft and corruption, with the perpetrators hiding behind a facade of legitimacy. The article aims to raise awareness and spark a wake-up call for Americans to recognize the truth.

“They have fed upon the innocent and helpless both going and coming—- stealing the benefit of our giving from the people we intended it for, and thereby stealing from us as well.”

“We paid for all these programs with the intention of taking care of everyone, and instead, these criminals have been like rats in a grain storage silo, putting out just enough to give a storefront appearance that these programs were real and helping people, while secretively embezzling from the poorest and most vulnerable Americans.”

“They have had a ‘two for one’ theft scheme going, in which the Americans are thought to be hard-hearted and greedy and selfish, and the people in the Third World are thought to be ungrateful, lazy, and incompetent, with neither party realizing that criminally dishonest middlemen have been the problem all along.”

Stop Waiting for a Savior: Take Responsibility for Your Governance

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|spiritual|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — This article is about the importance of self-empowerment and taking action in governance, which is relevant to the broader context of American governance history and legal concepts.

Anna von Reitz criticizes the idea of NESARA and the concept of waiting for a savior to solve the country’s problems, instead emphasizing the need for individuals to take action and responsibility for their own governance. She argues that NESARA is a pipe dream and that people should stop believing in it. She emphasizes the importance of self-empowerment and taking action to create change. This matters because it highlights the need for individuals to be proactive in their governance and to stop relying on external solutions.

“You have to get off your duff and make it happen. You can’t just sit around waiting for good things to happen and for good men to stand up. You have to stand up yourself and see who will stand up with you.”

“You ARE the good men and women, and if you don’t stand up, who will?”

“It’s the single biggest reason that we are in this mess. It’s the reason that the crooked politicians and dishonest bankers and corrupt lawyers have gotten away with this crap for so long.”

Peoplesawareness

history|legal|sovereignty

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — The article provides general background information on American governance history and legal concepts relevant to the Florida Assembly’s work, but it does not directly address state assembly operations or status correction steps.

Anna von Reitz critiques the People’s Awareness Coalition (PAC) and its guru LB Bork, arguing that they misunderstand key concepts of dual citizenship, jurisdiction, and the distinction between ‘citizens’ and ‘people’. This matters because it affects how individuals understand their rights and obligations under the law. Von Reitz emphasizes the importance of understanding the historical context and nuances of the law to avoid misinterpretation.

“For example, not knowing that the United States has always been foreign with respect to the states, that the United States has always embraced dual citizenship— and not just after the Civil War, that the United States Trust is what the United States of America was organized and tasked to protect, that the names of documents as well as the legal style of the name matters, that these things are meant to operate in completely different jurisdictions than the organic states— that is, the reason that the Federales call us ‘non-resident aliens’.”

“From the Federal perspective— that is, from the international jurisdiction of the sea— one can be one of the ‘People’ without being a citizen at all.”

“This is reiterated over and over in Federal Code and indeed, even by Bork, who refers to the language of the Fourteenth Amendment repeatedly and somehow fails to note that the Federales claim people born in their jurisdiction and anyone ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ as ‘citizens’ but one may be one of the people without being a citizen so far as the Feds are concerned.”

Ancientlanguage

sovereignty|spiritual

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — This article touches on sovereignty and jurisdiction, but primarily focuses on spiritual and philosophical concepts.

Anna von Reitz explains that the ancient language of our kind is mathematics, and that our existence is based on mathematical structures and the love of a single, all-encompassing Spirit. This Spirit, which we call ‘God’, is the Ordering Principle that creates and maintains the universe. We are all part of this Spirit and are connected to it in every way. This understanding is relevant to our sovereignty and jurisdiction as it highlights our inherent connection to the divine.

“Our brains are hard-wired to function mathematically and our bodies are hard-wired to function according to vast networks of mathematical formulas and within set parameters of probability.”

“If God didn’t withdraw His Spirit from us, we could not die.”

“In a sense, we are not living our lives, we are living His lives.”

Onepagereduction

sovereignty|jurisdiction|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — This article provides general information about the corporate structure of the United States and the implications for individual political status, but does not directly address state assembly operations or Florida-specific issues.

Anna von Reitz explains the current state of the United States corporate structure, stating that the old Federal Code is obsolete and the UNITED STATES, INC. is insolvent. She offers individuals a choice to be ‘enfranchised’ by remaining corporate entities or to reclaim their birthright status as free men under the United States Statutes-at-Large. This matters because it affects individuals’ understanding of their political status and the laws that apply to them.

“Your political status determines your ‘law’ and your ‘persona’ so long as that corporation exists and you are ‘enfranchised’ by it.”

“You have a CHOICE. You can live as a free man or as a corporate franchise operator.”

“You can live under the Law of the Land — the Ten Commandments, the lawful Constitution, the United States Statutes-at-Large or not.”

Annaaboutcontracts

sovereignty|jurisdiction|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — This article discusses general concepts about contracts and sovereignty, but does not provide specific actionable steps for Florida Assembly members.

Anna von Reitz argues that all contracts created by men are inherently flawed and void due to the unpredictability of human circumstances. She claims that even ‘good faith’ contracts are unenforceable and that a ‘loan’ is not the same as a ‘debt’. This matters because it highlights the flaws in the current system of contracts and the importance of moral obligations.

“All contracts made by men and even by our institutions— governments, corporations, etc.—-are rendered ridiculous and void the moment they are signed.”

“All that a contract can be and all that it can represent is a ‘good faith intention’.”

“People have no control of their circumstance or life-span or any of the many, many contributing factors that go into whether or not a contract—-even a contract made in ‘good faith’—can or will be kept.”

Historyhash

sovereignty|jurisdiction|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — The article discusses general concepts related to sovereignty, jurisdiction, and the importance of re-examining assumptions, but does not provide specific actionable steps for Florida Assembly members.

Anna von Reitz argues that people’s thinking patterns are being manipulated to focus on differences and individuality, rather than the unity and wholeness of the world. She suggests that this programming prevents people from seeing the truth and makes them vulnerable to manipulation. She encourages people to step back and re-examine their assumptions and to recognize the interconnectedness of all things. This can lead to a change in thinking patterns, life, and the world.

“You MUST step back far enough to see the whole and you must sort your way through what I call the ‘History Hash’ that you have been fed—either because those feeding it to you didn’t have enough of the pieces to the puzzle to tell you the truth, or because they deliberately obscured things to serve an agenda.”

“Now is all that exists. It is all that has ever existed and all that will ever exist.”

“You have been taught to think only in terms of either/or comparisons.”

Salutelisahavens

sovereignty|jurisdiction|legal|history

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — This article is about the implications of the IMF’s actions and the decriminalization of crimes in Tennessee, but it does not provide actionable steps for Florida Assembly members.

Anna von Reitz is praising Lisa Havens for exposing crimes committed by the IMF and the ‘Tennessee’ legislature, which has decriminalized murder, pillaging, and racketeering. This has serious implications for individuals operating as ‘persons’ under the state franchise. Anna is urging people to notify their local legislature and government officials about these crimes. The IMF has immunity from prosecution, but Anna believes that exposing their crimes can put their lives at stake.

“Just when you thought that American Journalism was stone, cold, dead and rotting in the ground, Lisa did the job— the real job— that hasn’t been getting done for decades.”

“If you are continuing to allow the IMF to have a back door into your life by operating as a ‘PERSON’ this should give you grave cause for concern.”

“When Christine LeGrand and friends know that they have been clearly identified as the source of this Problem, they will realize that their lives are at stake, too.”

Foolmeonce

history|legal|spiritual

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — This article provides background information on the history of maritime law and commerce, which is relevant to understanding the context of modern-day governance and jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz argues that the Tribe of Dan, not Judah, is the root of global trouble, and that they have been spreading their occult practices and idolatry through maritime commerce and the Law of the Sea. She claims that this tribe has been suppressed and forced underground, leading to the formation of secret societies. This matters because it challenges the common narrative about the source of global problems and highlights the importance of understanding the history of maritime law and commerce.

“The Tribe of Dan was one of the Ten Lost Tribes, but they were not ‘lost’ in the sense of being physically lost or their whereabouts unknown. They were lost in the spiritual sense because they turned away from the True God, the Creator, and followed after Ashtoreth and Ba-El and Molech and the rest of the vile Sumerian pantheon.”

“Every lie is a prayer in their system of things and any sexual act no matter how perverse is sacred in their view.”

“The Tribe of Dan dominated maritime commerce for thousands of years and they still do.”

Reality Check: Exposing the Planned ‘Divestiture’ of American Assets

sovereignty|jurisdiction|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — The article touches on sovereignty and jurisdiction concepts, but is more focused on international affairs and banking, making it tangentially related to assembly work.

Anna von Reitz argues that General Dunford is not acting as President of the United States, and that rumors of him doing so are unfounded. She believes that the US military and Joint Chiefs are complicit in the planned ‘Divestiture’ of American assets and the murder of American creditors. This is a reality that must be acknowledged and addressed. The article is a call to action to resist and expose the planned crimes.

“The entire history of the past 150 years could not have happened without the complicity of the Top Brass of the U.S. Military and that of NATO.”

“They intend to let loose their mercenary armies — the ‘agencies’ hidden in plain view—FEMA, FBI, BLM, etc., which have been provided with billions of rounds of ammo and body bags and extermination centers known as FEMA camps on the unsuspecting American People and anyone, including me, who resists will be the first to be murdered.”

“I have made every official and satrap from Dunford and Kerry on down responsible for their acts.”

Straightskinny

sovereignty|jurisdiction|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — The article touches on sovereignty, jurisdiction, and the debt-credit system, but is more focused on general American governance history and legal concepts.

Anna von Reitz claims the IMF has declared ‘war’ on American ‘persons’ due to the ‘United States’ mischaracterizing them as citizens, creating Cestui Que Vie Trusts, and using their assets as collateral for debts. She argues Americans are priority creditors and entitled to collect from the ‘United States’ corporation. The article calls for correcting each American’s political status and using a provided template to do so.

“They then created Cestui Que Vie Trusts named after us: JOHN MANLY DOE”

“We, the States of America, have accrued a National Credit equal to their ‘United States’ National Debt as a result of how the debt-credit system works”

“We have ordered the international Trustees and the banks involved to do the bookkeeping involved and settle the imbalance without further ado.”

Jacobrothschild

sovereignty|jurisdiction|history|legal

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — The article touches on general American governance history and legal concepts relevant as background, but does not provide actionable steps for Florida Assembly members.

Anna von Reitz accuses Jacob Rothschild of attempting to confuse the ‘New Republic’ with the American Republic, and criticizes the Rothschild family’s past actions, including misrepresenting Americans and causing trouble. She demands repayment of stolen American gold and debt owed to Americans. The article suggests that Americans have taken control of their finances and are no longer deceived by the Rothschild family’s efforts to profit from them.

“If a group of French conmen stole your identity, stole your credit cards and racked them through the roof, and left you to pay for it—–would you turn around and give the same group of criminals your new credit cards and let them start all over again?”

“We have already informed you in person and via your agents in England that we have made other arrangements and that any services provided by any of your new governmental services corporations are purely speculative on your part and acceptance of any services on our parts does not in any way imply agreement or contract or any valid claim for your corporations to be Successors to Contract.”

“You don’t pretend that those two wars in Iraq and Kuwait and countless incursions and ‘police actions’ in other places actually had anything to do with defending a square centimeter of American soil, do you?”

Presidentialtransition

history|legal|sovereignty|spiritual

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — The article discusses general American governance history and legal concepts relevant as background, but does not provide actionable steps or specific information about state assembly operations or Florida.

Anna von Reitz claims that the ‘Presidential Transition’ is a scheme by two French corporations, the UN Corp and the Federal Reserve, to liquidate the assets of American citizens to pay off the debts of the insolvent ‘UNITED STATES’ and transfer control to ‘THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’. This would be a massive act of genocide and enslavement. The article suggests that the American people are living under a system of ‘law’ created in Ancient Sumeria that is idolatrous and enslaving.

“The military has been in control of ‘governmental services’ in this country since 1863 when Lincoln bankrupted the original United States (Trading Company).”

“The UN Corporation owns both the ‘UNITED STATES’ and ‘THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’.”

“This is what it means to, ‘Come out of Babylon!’—- expatriate from the ‘world’ of idolatry and enslavement.”

Paymentinfull

history|legal|sovereignty

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — The article discusses general American governance history and legal concepts relevant as background, but does not provide actionable steps or specific information directly related to the Florida Assembly’s operations.

Anna von Reitz claims that the instructions have been given to the Trustees, including Pope Francis and the Bank of International Settlements, to pay off the national debt of the ‘United States’ and return American assets to their rightful owners. This is allegedly done as the lawful beneficiaries and heirs of The New Testament Trust and The United States Trust 1779. The article suggests that this action would eliminate any excuse for the ‘United States’ to carry out any actions against the American people to settle the debts.

“Our instructions have already been given once to the Trustees including Pope Francis and the Bank of International Settlements.”

“We authorize the transfer of sufficient funds from our National Credit to pay off the National Debt of the ‘United States’ defined as the ‘territories and District of Columbia’.”

“We also authorize the return of all American assets free and clear of tithes, fees, taxes, debts, claims, registrations, or other encumbrances to the Americans to whom these assets are owed.”

Synopsis

sovereignty|jurisdiction|legal|history

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — The article discusses general American governance history and legal concepts relevant as background, but does not provide actionable steps for state assembly operations or status correction.

Anna von Reitz explains that the ‘United States’ causing trouble is actually just the District of Columbia and its territories, while the ‘United States of America (Minor)’ has committed fraud against the rest of the world. The ‘United States Major’ has issued new Sovereign Letters Patent and appointed new representatives, and is working to resolve the financial system changes. The ‘United States Major’ is seeking to end the conflict with the American people and their property assets. The goal is to restore honesty and stability to international markets.

“The “United States” that has been causing all the trouble is only “the territories and District of Columbia”.”

“We have acted as the lawful Beneficiaries and Priority Creditors and have authorized the discharge of the “National Debt” owed by the UNITED STATES, INC.”

“We welcome the understanding and the assistance of the international community as we put our house in order.”

Haguenoticeoffraudarticle

history|legal|sovereignty

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — This article discusses general American governance history and legal concepts relevant as background, but does not directly address state assembly operations or status correction steps.

Anna von Reitz issues a Judicial Notice of Fraud and Violation and Order to Cease and Desist regarding the use of all capital letter naming conventions in court proceedings, claiming it distinguishes between free men, bondservants, and slaves. This has implications for corporate citizenship and the 14th Amendment. The notice aims to prohibit the use of this convention and the Glossa itself in court cases.

“Why should such a name as ‘JOHN HENRY DOE’ exist?”

“The implications of this ancient history taken together with the circumstance surrounding the end of the Civil War… are obvious without a degree in rocket science.”

“Both the practice and the object are grounds for claims of misrepresentation, non-disclosure, and fraud.”

Requiem

history|legal|spiritual

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — The article discusses American governance history and the importance of remembering past sacrifices, but it does not provide actionable steps for Florida Assembly members.

Anna von Reitz reflects on her birthday, D-Day, and the sacrifices of her family members who fought in World War II. She warns that Americans have forgotten the price of their freedom and are repeating the same mistakes that led to past wars. This forgetfulness has allowed external forces to manipulate and control the country. She calls for Americans to remember their past and let go of it to prevent future wars.

“We, in our joyous peace, have each time been granted victory and then forgotten the price we’ve paid.”

“There can be no end to war in the external world until we put an end to the war within ourselves.”

“Let me say that there can be no future untainted by the past until we both remember it and willfully let go of it.”

Nlaandkarenhudes

history|legal|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — The article discusses banking and currency concepts relevant to American governance history and legal concepts, but does not provide actionable steps for Florida Assembly members.

Anna von Reitz argues that Karen Hudes and the Bank of International Settlements are trying to deceive people into exchanging their Federal Reserve notes for gold-backed currency, which is essentially worthless. She claims that the Bank Rats have been defrauding people and governments worldwide, and now they want to use gold as a new form of currency to continue their scheme. Anna proposes a better solution: liquidate the banks and corrupt regulatory agencies, seize their assets, and establish a public banking system.

“They thought they were buying our lawful currency, but they were buying Federal Reserve funny money instead.”

“The reason Hudes spouts off about World War III is that if they can’t get us to buy into their fraud—- at our great disadvantage— they propose to kill off their Priority Creditors so they don’t have to pay us back what they owe.”

“We kill the banks and corrupt bank regulatory agencies instead. Liquidate them as crime syndicates.”

The Gun Control Conundrum: A Florida Assembly Perspective

sovereignty|jurisdiction|assembly-process|history|legal|spiritual|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 5/10 — The article touches on general American governance history and legal concepts relevant as background, but does not directly address state assembly operations or Florida-specific issues.

Anna von Reitz argues that Democrats are responsible for most mass shootings and that gun control is not the solution. She suggests that the real issue is the lack of armed citizens who can defend themselves. The article questions the motives of the Democratic Party and encourages citizens to arm themselves for self-defense.

“I have watched guns for sixty years: rifles, pistols, Uzzis and submachine guns in general, air rifles, AK47s, 911s, 50 mm sniper rifles, elephant guns, shot guns, little bitty two shot Derringers, you name it, I’ve observed them lying on logs, perched on tables, snugged down in gun cabinets, tucked behind doors, over doors, carried in holsters and backpacks and purses—- and I have never once seen a gun move by itself. Ever. Not as much as a quarter of an inch.”

“If all those people had been on their toes and carrying sidearms, we wouldn’t be talking about fifty dead Americans in Orlando. We wouldn’t talking about one dead nutcase, either. He’d simply be dead and we’d never know—-and that would be all right with us.”

Templeofmarduk

history|legal|spiritual|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 4/10 — Anna’s claims are tangentially related to the concept of sovereignty and jurisdiction, but her focus on biblical prophecies and historical events makes it more relevant to the category of ‘history’ and ‘legal concepts’ rather than directly actionable steps for the Florida Assembly.

Anna von Reitz claims that the rebuilding of the Arches of the Temple of Marduk in London and New York is an attempt to invoke the ancient Babylonian ‘god’ Marduk, which is actually Lucifer. She believes this will lead to the destruction of both cities and warns that the rest of the world is ignorantly allowing this to happen. She bases her claims on biblical prophecies and historical events.

“Picture a great big, glowing red Bull’s Eye painted on New York and London, because that is what these deluded monsters are doing and which the rest of you are ignorantly allowing.”

“When the Hebrews entered Canaan they were given a very odd directive. They were told to kill everyone and everything— even the domestic animals. None were to be spared.”

“IF there’s no God and no Devil, then there is, self-evidently, a very well-organized multi-generational stage crew of people devoted to the Bible as a playscript and they are determined to carry it off: Act One….Act Two….Act Three…”

Fulfordreport

history|legal|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 4/10 — The article discusses international banking and currency manipulation, which is tangentially related to the Florida Assembly’s work on sovereignty and jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz critiques Benjamin Fulford’s report, stating that the true intention of the global elite is to hoard gold, devalue fiat currency, and profit from it. She argues that the Chinese government has been co-opted by the elite and is assisting in their scheme. The article highlights the historical context of gold manipulation and the potential consequences of the elite’s plan.

“Collect the money and you disperse the people, collect the people and you disperse the money.”

“It’s a simple enough plan for a child to grasp. First, you steal all the gold and hoard it.”

“Gold is a fairly useless substance.”

Bankertruth

other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 3/10 — The article discusses international banking and currency manipulation, which is tangentially related to the Florida Assembly’s work on sovereignty and jurisdiction.

Anna von Reitz argues that the global currency reset is a scam by bankers to profit from the eventual failure of fiat currencies. They have been manipulating the value of gold and silver to reap massive profits when the currencies collapse. This is a deliberate plan to steal the value of people’s labor and natural resources.

“It is not a question of whether or not a fiat currency will fail. It is only a question of WHEN it will fail and how much inflation will take place before it is officially abandoned and debunked as the fraud scheme that all such currencies are.”

“They created the problem and they are standing there slavering, waiting to present the solution to the problem they created—–and reap the profit they have planned for all along.”

“They have stolen the value of your labor and your country’s natural resources for a hundred years via the process of inflation of the currency,”

Idiocyabounds

other

Relevance: 🟢🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 3/10 — This article is tangentially related to banking and international affairs, but does not provide actionable steps for Florida Assembly members.

Anna von Reitz argues that the ‘Global Reset’ and ‘Global Currency Reset’ are scams that will lead to hyperinflation, rendering fiat digital money useless. She warns that those who participate in this scheme will be complicit in the fraud and may lose their property. The article is a warning to people to wake up and not fall for the promises of easy wealth.

“Are all those sending these messages around the globe completely mad? Dumbed down to the extent that they cannot easily calculate the effect of giving everyone ‘millions of dollars’ all at once?”

“It will cost a million such ‘dollars’ for a loaf of bread.”

“Wake to hell up out of your greedy dreams and hear the birds singing.”

Moofsatanists

spiritual|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 2/10 — This article is more focused on spiritual and philosophical concepts rather than directly addressing state assembly operations or sovereignty process.

Anna von Reitz describes the modus operandi of Satanists, who infiltrate major religions and operate by serving the ‘Cause of Death’ rather than the ‘Cause of Life’. She emphasizes the importance of discerning between the Creator and Satan, and choosing to serve the former. This choice affects one’s name being written in the Book of Life or the Book of the Dead.

“You must look at their works and judge their fruits.”

“You exist either as a Man and choose to honor your Creator, or you exist as a Corporation– a dead, imaginary Thing — and honor Satan, instead.”

“I must be ‘ana’, meaning ‘grace’ and ‘Mother’, or I must be ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER, a corporate franchise benefiting the UN Corporation.”

The Role of Evil: A Philosophical Perspective

spiritual|other

Relevance: 🟢🟢⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ 2/10 — The article is more focused on spiritual and philosophical concepts rather than directly related to state assembly operations or specific actions.

Anna von Reitz discusses the concept of evil and its role in the universe, suggesting that it is a necessary part of the Creator’s plan for human growth and education. She argues that evil is not the enemy, but rather a tool used by Satan, who is seen as God’s Vice-President in charge of evil. This perspective is meant to help individuals understand the complexities of good and evil and make choices that lead to life and growth. The article is more philosophical and spiritual in nature, rather than directly related to state assembly operations or specific actions.

“Satan is God’s Vice-President in charge of Evil.”

“Satan has a job appointment, and it is a job he does very well.”

“We are free to choose death, even Ultimate Death, instead of life—- and even the Ultimate Life available to us.”